Tucson's Dear Leader

As the Councilor of the City of Tucson’s Ward 1 Office, Regina Romero once declared on her website “We’re here to serve you.” Ever wonder what would happen to someone who dared to question Regina Romero? What we learned and what you will soon see, it is now crystal clear, we mustn’t upset Tucson’s Dear Leader!

We will lay out everything that happened to a curious lad who asked a question, albeit a tough question, of Regina Romero. We ask our dear readers that they review the investigation “Vile & Repugnant” to refresh their memory on this matter.

We will begin with the timeline of the events related to this investigation. We have added the page number where these pages can be located so you don’t have to dig through 197 pages of an Office of Professional Standards investigation. By the way, the investigation in its entirety is posted below the timeline.

September 29, 2017- Margarita Romero-Durazzi is arrested for multiple DUI charges.

April 4, 2018-(page 15) Ms. Romero-Durazzi accepted a plea deal and was sentenced to probation that ended on July 4, 2019.

April 12, 2018- (page 24) Correspondence between what appears to be Regina Romero’s Ward 1 Office and Barraza Investigations is documented by certified mail receipt. Wait, who? *Barraza Investigations is a Phoenix based “fully bi-lingual private investigative agency.” Keep reading, there is more on this subject later in the investigation.

April 20, 2018- (page 25) Mr. Voss made his public record request for the body worn camera (BWC) footage of this incident.

January 9, 2019- Regina Romero announced her run for Mayor of the City of Tucson.

May 13, 2019- (page 23) The public record request is fulfilled by the Tucson Police Department. This is the request for the BWC footage for this incident as well as other requests. The time it took to fill this request was over one year.

July 8, 2019- (page 11) Mr. Voss delivered a “package” to Regina Romero’s Ward 1 Office. Included in this “package” was documentation from Tucson City Court, a copy of Officer Bonanno’s BWC footage, and of course, the letter, which included the author’s real name and real phone number.

*The next two entries are deliberately out of order. Usually the acknowledgement of a complaint is received after the complaint*

July 26, 2019- (page 41) Regina Romero contacted Tucson PD Chief of Police Chris Magnus and requested he provide clarification on her “lack of involvement in this case and dispel the patently false allegations of misconduct.”

July 18, 2019- (page 19) Office of Professional Standards personnel contacted Regina Romero to advise our Dear Leader they have been assigned to investigate Regina’s complaint…that Regina made…or will make…8 days later.

July 31, 2019- (page 36) “Officer Voss” was notified of this investigation by being advised he was cleared of any wrongdoing in this investigation.

August 1, 2019- THIS ARTICLE is published and we learn that Mr. Voss is not only “vile,” but he was found to be “repugnant” too. :(

As the letter stated in the opening line, we have a registered voter, a taxpayer, and a denizen of the City of Tucson who was made aware of an incident and wanted to know more (the term “citizen” is oppressive according to Tucson’s Corrupt Leadership, so we try not to use it). The incident involved the sister of an elected official-someone our “suspect” could either vote for or not vote for. He provided video evidence, courtroom documentation, and of course, the letter that included his real name and his real phone number. He even thanked her for her time!

What did she do?

She somehow found out where he worked, and she told on him. She went straight to the big boss and demanded he was investigated, and he was. We think it is worth mentioning Regina Romero, follow us on this one, went to this guy’s boss’s, boss’s, boss’s, boss’s, boss’s, boss’s, boss and she demanded he was investigated. That’s seven bosses up for those who are counting.

I guess we can throw this out as a caution for anyone who is considering questioning Tucson’s Dear Leader, Mayor Regina Romero. What happened here could very well happen to you if you dare to question your government, if you have the audacity to put pen to paper and ask what all of these “public servants,” that work for us, are up to.

What bothered us about this investigation?

-Why and how did Regina Romero try to find out what Mr. Voss did for a living? Does it matter where he worked? Do certain careers change one’s first amendment right to question one’s government officials? We don’t think so. In her “original complaint,” we noticed she referred to the “suspect” as “James Voss,” and then “Mr. Voss” twice. She then decides the suspect is “TPD Officer Voss.” She finally goes back to calling him “Mr. Voss” two times before wrapping up this letter on July 26, 2019. Again, the acknowledgement of this complaint was sent to Regina Romero, 8 days before she made her “original” complaint. We have the best and brightest Tucson’s Corrupt Leadership.com has to offer trying to figure out how that works. When we figure it out we’ll let you know.

-What justification was there to investigate all of Mr. Voss’s requests? What did the other two requests have to do with this investigation?

-We noticed there were 77 pages of the total 197 pages of this investigation that were dedicated to the body worn camera audit trail. We get it; you can’t have people viewing these videos without authorization. But it leads us to ask this question: Why was this employee’s possible access to the audit trail an issue when it is not an issue for chief-level commanders in the “Team 4 In Custody Death” investigation? Oh yeah, “certain commanders” can receive digital copies of body worn camera footage without showing up on the audit trail.

-Who is Barraza Investigations and how are they involved in this Tucson PD OPS investigation? Again, they are a Phoenix based “fully bi-lingual private investigative agency.” The certified mail receipt is dated April 12, 2018. Mr. Voss, or whatever Regina wants to call him, made his original request on April 20, 2018, 8 days after the correspondence with Barraza Investigations. So this was after the DUI arrest but before Mr. Voss’s original request and before Regina Romero made her announcement that she was running for mayor. We found the Barraza Investigations correspondence to be strange. There’s no explanation for this correspondence so we’ll just leave this as a question, why is this here?

As promised, we looked into this a little further. We asked the City of Tucson about Barraza Investigations. Apparently, our request was sent to a few different departments. What did they find? Nothing..."That search yielded no results."

Tucson's Dear Leader

Part 1 of 2

Part 2 of 2